Petitioner applied for anticipatory bail. Counsel stated no crime was registered and there was no apprehension of arrest. The court dismissed the petition.
Petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA
WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND JUNE 2010 / 12TH JYAISTHA 1932
Bail Appl..No. 486 of 2010()
NO CRIME REGISTERED
(S): PETITIONERS
BY ADV. SRI.J.JULIAN XAVIER
SRI.FIROZ K.ROBIN
RESPONDENT(S):
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZ.
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
K.HEMA, J.
Bail Application No.486 of 2010
Dated 2nd June, 2010.
O R D E R
This petition is for anticipatory bail.
light of Annexure 8 judgment of this Court dated 1.2.2010 in W.P.
(C) No.3167/2010, no action is being taken by police and
petitioners are not apprehending arrest.
Hence, petition is dismissed.
K.HEMA, JUDGE.
tgs
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail petition should be allowed when no crime is registered and no apprehension of arrest exists.
PAUL SEBASTIAN, PAUL S.
STATE OF KERALA, Sub Inspector of Police
KHEMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
