Disposed

Radhakrishnan v. State of Kerala and Others

Kerala HC9 Nov 2010Bail Appl./4592/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala rejected an application for anticipatory bail in a public order case. Instead, the court directed the accused to surrender for interrogation on November 22 or 23, 2010, before applying for regular bail.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to surrender for interrogation on 22.11.2010 or 23.11.2010 and apply for regular bail thereafter; anticipatory bail denied.

Radhakrishnan Vs State of Kerala and Others — Anticipatory Bail | Kerala HC (2010)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 9TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 18TH KARTHIKA 1932

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 4592 of 2010()

¶6

----------------------------CRIME NO.222/2010 OF MARAYOOR POLICE STATION

¶7

PETITIONER/4TH ACCUSED

¶8

¶9

RADHAKRISHNAN, S/O.RAMASWAMY, PONGUMPALLY ST COLONY, KEEZHAMTHUR VILLAGE, IDUKKI DT.

¶10

BY ADV. SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN

¶11

RESPONDENT(S): STATE & COMPLAINANT

¶12

¶13

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶14

SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MARAYOOR POLICE STATION, IDUKKI DT.

¶15

CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUNNAR POLICE STATION.

¶16

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZE

¶17

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶18

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶19

......................................... B.A. No.4592 of 2010

¶20

.......................................... Dated: 09.11.2010

¶21

ORDER

¶22

Petitioner, who is the 4^th accused in Crime No.222/2010 of Marayoor Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 143,147,148,324,342 and 332 read with 149 I.P.C., seeks anticipatory bail.

¶23

The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application.

¶24

Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature.

¶25

But at the same time, I am inclined to permit the petitioner to surrender before the Investigating Officer for the purpose of interrogation and then to have his application for bail considered by the Magistrate having jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petitioner shall surrender before the investigating officer on 22.11.2010 or on 23.11.2010 for the purpose of interrogation and recovery of incriminating material, if any. The petitioner shall thereafter be produced before the Magistrate who on being satisfied that the petitioner has been interrogated by the police shall consider and dispose of his application for regular bail preferably on the same date on which it is filed.

¶26

This petition is disposed of as above.

¶27

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE

¶28

Radhakrishnan v. State of Kerala and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Radhakrishnan v. State of Kerala and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aneesh Vs State of Kerala

Prem Shameer Vs the State of Kerala

Sasidharan Vs the S.H.O. Venjarammoodu

Murukayiah Vs State of Kerala

Krishnan & Others Vs State of Kerala and Others

Nagappan and Others Vs State of Kerala and Others