Disposed

Sasidharan v. the S.H.O. Venjarammoodu

Kerala HC8 Nov 2010Bail Appl./6237/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of a bail application by declining immediate anticipatory bail, directing the petitioner to surrender for interrogation and then seek bail from a Magistrate.

What did the court decide?

Only the petitioner is permitted to surrender for interrogation; he must then apply for regular bail from the Magistrate. No immediate relief is granted under B.A. No. 6237 of 2010.

Sasidharan Vs the S.H.O. Venjarammoodu — Cheating and Forgery | Kerala HC (2010)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶3

MONDAY, THE 8TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 17TH KARTHIKA 1932

¶4

Bail Appl..No. 6237 of 2010() ----------------------------CRIME NO.207/2009 OF VENJARAMOODU POLICE STATION

¶5

PETITIONER/7TH ACCUSED:

¶6

¶7

SASIDHARAN, S/O.GOVINDAN NAIR, AGED 53 YEARS, PALAZHI NIKETHAN, NEETHIMUKKU, THALIKUZHI, PULIMATH VILLAGE, CHIRAYINKEEZHU TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.

¶8

BY ADV. SRI.J.JAYAKUMAR

¶9

RESPONDENT(S):

¶10

¶11

THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VENJARAMMOODU POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶12

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK

¶13

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶14

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶15

......................................... B.A. No.6237 of 2010

¶16

Dated: 08.11.2010

¶17

ORDER

¶18

Petitioner who is the 8^th accused in Crime No.207/2009 of Venjaramoodu Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 420,465 and 468 read with 34 I.P.C., seeks anticipatory bail.

¶19

The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application.

¶20

Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature. But at the same time, I am inclined to permit the petitioner to surrender before the Investigating Officer for the purpose of interrogation and then to have his application for bail considered by the Magistrate having jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petitioner shall surrender before the investigating officer on 22.11.2010 or on 23.11.2010 for the purpose of interrogation and recovery of incriminating material, if any. After interrogation, petitioner shall be produced before the Magistrate concerned who on being convinced that the petitioner has been interrogated by the police, shall release the petitioner on bail on the petitioner executing a bond for `15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate and subject to the following conditions:-

¶21

B.A.No.6237 /2010

¶22

-:2:-

¶23

Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

¶24

The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation including custodial interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer.

¶25

Petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

¶26

Petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

¶27

If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶28

This petition is disposed of as above.

¶29

¶30

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE

Sasidharan v. the S.H.O. Venjarammoodu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sasidharan v. the S.H.O. Venjarammoodu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bobby @ Henry S.Paduva Vs Sub Inspector of Police, Aluva.

Anilkumar P.S. Vs the State of Kerala

Raju @ Karutha Pandyan Vs State of Kerala

Aneesh Vs State of Kerala

Prem Shameer Vs the State of Kerala

Abdul Rahman Vs State of Kerala