Dismissed

Murukayiah v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC9 Nov 2010Bail Appl./4572/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala declined the grant of anticipatory bail to a petitioner accused in an affray case. Instead, the court directed the petitioner to surrender for interrogation before the Investigating Officer within a specified timeframe, after which bail would be considered by the Magistrate.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to surrender for interrogation before IO on 22.11.2010 or 23.11.2010; Magistrate to consider bail thereafter.

Murukayiah Vs State of Kerala — Anticipatory Bail | Kerala HC (2010)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 9TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 18TH KARTHIKA 1932

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 4572 of 2010()

¶6

----------------------------CRIME NO.222/2010 OF MARAYOOR POLICE STATION

¶7

PETITIONER/20TH ACCUSED

¶8

¶9

MURUKAYAIH,S/O.VELU, KGP 8/262,PATHADIPALAM SC COLONY, KOVILKADAVU KEEZHAMTHUR VILLAGE, IDUKKI DT.

¶10

BY ADV. SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN

¶11

RESPONDENT(S): STATE & COMPLAINANT

¶12

¶13

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTION, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶14

SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MARAYOOR POLICE STATION,IDUKKI DISTRICT.

¶15

CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUNNAR POLICE STATION.

¶16

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZE

¶17

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶18

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶19

......................................... B.A. No.4572 of 2010

¶20

......................................... Dated: 09.11.2010

¶21

ORDER

¶22

Petitioner, who is the 20^th accused in Crime No.222/2010 of Marayoor Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 143,147,148,324,342 and 332 read with 149 I.P.C., seeks anticipatory bail.

¶23

The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application.

¶24

Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature.

¶25

But at the same time, I am inclined to permit the petitioner to surrender before the Investigating Officer for the purpose of interrogation and then to have his application for bail considered by the Magistrate having jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petitioner shall surrender before the investigating officer on 22.11.2010 or on 23.11.2010 for the purpose of interrogation and recovery of incriminating material, if any. The petitioner shall thereafter be produced before the Magistrate who on being satisfied that the petitioner has been interrogated by the police shall consider and dispose of his application for regular bail preferably on the same date on which it is filed.

¶26

This petition is disposed of as above.

¶27

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE

¶28

Murukayiah v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Murukayiah v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aneesh Vs State of Kerala

Prem Shameer Vs the State of Kerala

Sasidharan Vs the S.H.O. Venjarammoodu

Radhakrishnan Vs State of Kerala and Others

Krishnan & Others Vs State of Kerala and Others

Nagappan and Others Vs State of Kerala and Others