The Court rejected an application for anticipatory bail as the petitioner is only a suspect and not yet an accused. The apprehension of arrest was not well-founded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 16TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 25TH BHADRA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 3697 of 2010() ----------------------------(CRIME NO.62/2010 OF DEVIKULAM POLICE STATION)
PETITIONER
REV.M.JAYARAJ, S/O.MOSES, AGED 50 YEARS,(PASTOR), C.P.4/176, CHINNAKANAL.P.O, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.R.DIVAKARAN SRI.VINUCHAND
RESPONDENTS: ---------------
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
V.RAMKUMAR, J.
---------------------------------------------Bail Application No.3697 of 2010
Dated this the 16th day of September, 2010
ORDER
Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail on the allegation that the Devikulam Police are at his heels in connection with Crime No.62/2010 registered for offences punishable under Sections 302 read with Section 34 I.P.C.
Reserving the above right, this petition is dismissed.
V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE
skj
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to a suspect who is not yet an accused in a case involving sections 302 and 34 of the IPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rev. M. Jayaraj
State of Kerala
V.Ramkumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
