The Hon'ble Court declined to grant anticipatory bail. It directed the petitioners to surrender for interrogation by the police before 25 September 2010 to seek regular bail from the Magistrate.
Directed petitioners to surrender for interrogation before 25.9.2010 and produce before Magistrate thereafter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 24TH BHADRA 1932
Bail Appl..No. 3959 of 2010(F) -----------------------------------------(CRIME NO.400/2010 OF THE EAST KALLADA POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT) ...................
PETITIONER/ACCUSED NOS. 6 TO 8:
-----------------------------------------------------
1. SHAJI, S/O.PURUSHOTHAMAN, SHAJI MANDIRAM PATTAMTHURUTHU, MANTROTHURUTH, KOLLAM.
2. MADHU, S/O.KUMARAN, THOTTUKARAYIL VEEDU, NENMENY THEKKU, MANDROTHURUTH, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
3. PRAKASH PURUSHOTHAMAN, S/O.PURUSHOTHAMAN, ANASWARA, NENMENY, MANDROTHURUTH, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.C.RAJENDRAN.
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
---------------------------------------------
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR, EAST KALLADA POLICE STATION, THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.S. HRITHWIK.
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/09/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
prv.
V. RAMKUMAR, J.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ B.A. No. 3959 of 2010
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Dated: 15th day of September, 2010
ORDER
Petitioners, who are accused Nos.6 to 8 in Crime No.400/2010 of East Kallada Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 395, 332, 308, 353, 294(b) I.P.C. and Section 3(1) of PDPP Act, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application.
This petition is disposed of as above.
V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE
dmb
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail can be granted in the present case involving offences under Sections 395, 332, 308, 353, 294(b) IPC and Section 3(1) of PDPP Act.
6 provisions across 2 enactments
Shaji
Madhu
Prakash Purushothaman
State of Kerala
V. Ramkumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
