Sheaine.P. v. Ravi
Case brief
What is this about?
This writ petition challenged a Subordinate Judge's order allowing a respondent to amend his petition to sue as an indigent person. The Court held that the writ petition lacked merit as it did not indicate impropriety or illegality in the lower court's order.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 6TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 15TH KARTHIKA 1931
WP(C).No. 9240 of 2008(Y)
-----------------------------------POP.19/2007 of I ADDL.SUB COURT, THRISSUR
PETITIONER(S):
------------------------
SHEAINE.P., D/O.AYYAPPAN, AGED 43 YEARS, POOKKUTH HOUSE, PERIMBIDARI P.O., MANNARKKAD.
BY MR.K.RAMAKUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE BY ADV. MR.MR.J.R.PREM NAVAZ
RESPONDENT(S):
--------------------------
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court can entertain a writ petition challenging the Subordinate Judge's order allowing amendment of a petition to sue as an indigent person.
Whether the petitioner suffered prejudice or injury by allowing the withdrawal of admissions in the amended indigent petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SHEAINE.P.
- respondent
RAVI
- respondent
AYYAPPAN
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court