now employed abroad. The facts disclose that the 1st petitioner wife has to look after a one year old child, the 2nd petitioner. Needless to point out, it may be difficult rather most inconvenient for the 1st petitioner, who is stated to be having permanent residence at Kottayam to go over to Ernakulam to defend the case launched against her by the husband in the Family Court at that station. In case, she is compelled to go over to that Family court, either she has to carry the 2nd petitioner also or leave it to the care of someone else in the family. That child, in view of the estrangement of the spouses, has already been deprived the love, care and affection of the father, and that being the case, if the mother is compelled to go over to a distant place, it will affect her physical wellbeing. Taking that also into consideration, I direct for transfer of O.P.No.313 of 2009 on the file of the Family Court, Ernakulam to the Family Court, Kottayam. The learned counsel for the respondent/husband submitted that direction/order be issued for personal exemption of the respondent before the transferee court since he is at present employed at abroad. It is open to the
