Dismissed

Vivish Thomas v. Deputy Commissioner (Appeals)

Kerala HC1 Jan 2009WP(C)/31/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala disposed of the writ petition directing the Deputy Commissioner to decide on delay petitions (Ext.P4) and stay petitions (Ext.P6) within one month, while staying revenue recovery proceedings (Ext.P1) until then.

What did the court decide?

Revenue recovery proceedings stayed pending consideration of delay and stay petitions by the 1st respondent within one month.

Vivish Thomas Vs Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) — Writ and Judicial Review | Kerala HC (2009)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 1ST JANUARY 2009 / 11TH POUSHA 1930

¶5

WP(C).No. 31 of 2009(D)

PETITIONER(S):

VIVISH THOMAS MANAGING PARTNER M/S.VEESCO PAVERS & V.TECH PAVERS MUNCIPAL INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, KODIMATHA KOTTAYAM, RESIDINGAT VETTOOR HOUSE KANJIKUZHY PO, KOTTAYAM

¶10

BY ADV. SRI.C.K.SREEJITH

¶11

RESPONDENT(S):

¶12

¶13

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER(APPEALS) COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT THEVALLY PO, KOTTAYAM

¶14

COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER IIND CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

¶15

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER KVAT SPECIAL CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

¶16

STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO TAXES, GOVT. OF KERALA TRIVANDRUM

¶17

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV.SRI.C.K.GOVINDAN

¶18

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 1.1.2009 , THE COURT ON 01/01/2009 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶19

K.M. JOSEPH, J.

¶20

¶21

W.P.(C) No. 31 OF 2009 D

¶22

¶23

Dated this the 1^st day of January, 2009

¶24

J U D G M E N T

¶25

I heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Government Pleader.

¶26

Writ petition is disposed of directing the 1^st respondent to consider and take a decision on Ext.P4 series delay petitions and if the delay is condoned, there will be a further direction to the 1^st respondent to consider and take a decision on Ext.P6 series stay petitions in accordance with law, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till such time, revenue recovery proceedings against the petitioner pursuant to Ext.P1 series assessment orders shall be kept in abeyance. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment before the 1^st respondent as soon as it is received.

¶27

(K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE)

¶28

aks

Vivish Thomas v. Deputy Commissioner (Appeals)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vivish Thomas v. Deputy Commissioner (Appeals)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Ismail Beevi Vs Shajahan

P.P.Sebastian Vs Village Officer

Arun Vs the Circle Inspector of Police,Nedumkand

M/S.Malabar Collections (P) Ltd. Vs the Asst. Commissioner

A.Ramakrishnan Vs Thajuddin & Others

K.T.Anil,Mg.Partner of M/S.a One Food Pr Vs Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) & Others