Dismissed
Paulose George Construction Co.(P) Ltd. v. the Kerala Minerals & Metals Limited
Kerala HCWP(C)/15667/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT :…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 20TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 29TH KARTHIKA 1931
WP(C).No. 15667 of 2009(C) --------------------------
PETITIONER(S): ---------------
PAULOSE GEORGE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (P) LIMITED, ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS, AISWARYA ANEEX, KARIMUGHAL.P.O, KOCHI - 682 303, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI.T.V. PAULOSE.
BY ADV. SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.T.RAMPRASAD UNNI SRI.C.R.REKHESH SHARMA
RESPONDENT(S): ---------------
THE KERALA MINERALS AND METALS LIMITED, CHAVARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
(ADDL. R2 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 31.7.2009 IN I.A. NO.9599 OF 2009)
*R2 GARWARE-WALL ROPES LIMITED, R.K.BUILDINGS, V.R.M. ROAD RAVIPURAM, COCHIN 682 016 AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT PLOT NO.11, MIDC, CHINCHWAD, PUNE REP. BY AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
ADV. SRI.A.KUMAR FOR ADDL.RESPONDENT SRI. K.ANAND SMT. LATHA KRISHNAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
P.N.RAVINDRAN, J.
W.P.(C) No. 15667 OF 2009
Dated this the 20th day of November, 2009
J U D G M E N T
In the light of the memo dated 9.11.2009 filed by the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
P.N.RAVINDRAN, JUDGE
vps
Paulose George Construction Company (P) Limited
The Kerala Minerals and Metals Limited
Garware-Wall Ropes Limited
P.N. Ravindran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court