G.Vinod v. J.Spadikam
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a writ petition challenging an order returning the execution warrant unexecuted. The High Court held the petition to be an abuse of process designed to protract proceedings and dismissed it.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was dismissed as an abuse of the process of the court.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.P.BALACHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 13TH JANUARY 2009 / 23RD POUSHA 1930
WP(C).No.1263 of 2009(A)
-------------------------------E.P.80/08 IN O.S.149/99 OF PRL. M.C., KOLLAM
PETITIONER:
---------------
G. VINOD, S/O. GANGADHARAN, PATTATHUVILA VEEDU, KADAPPAKKADA, KOLLAM.
BY ADV. SRI.WILSON URMESE
RESPONDENT:
-----------------
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition filed against an order returning the execution warrant unexecuted constitutes an abuse of the process of the court?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
G. VINOD
- respondent
J. SPADIKAM
Coram
K.P.BALACHANDRAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court