Babu v. Francis
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court in Kerala issued a writ petition disposal order directing the civil court below not to dismiss the suit solely due to a commission report deficiency if it fails to properly adjudicate contentions, instead affording an opportunity to secure a fresh report.
What did the court decide?
Directed the court below to not dismiss the suit for want of a commission report if it does not enable disposal, but to afford opportunity to get a fresh commission report.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.P.BALACHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 12TH JANUARY 2009 / 22ND POUSHA 1930
WP(C).No. 1148 of 2009(J) -----------------------------------------OS.2711/2002 of PRL.MUNSIFF COURT,THRISSUR ....................
PETITIONER:
BABU, S/O. ARANGASSERY JOSE, ARANGASSERY HOUSE, PERAMANGALAM VILLAGE, DESOM THRISSUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.RANJITH XAVIER
RESPONDENT:
FRANCIS, S/O.ARANGASSERY VAREED, ARANGASSERY HOUSE, PERAMANGALAM VILLAGE, DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K.P. Balachandran, J.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
BABU
- respondent
FRANCIS
Coram
K.P. BALACHANDRAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court