The High Court of Kerala dismissed the Criminal Revision Petition by default due to the absence of counsel for the petitioner and a lack of representation on his behalf, deeming him uninterested in a considered order.
Criminal Revision Petition dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.P.BALACHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 12TH JANUARY 2009 / 22ND POUSHA 1930
CRP.No.904 of 2005 (E)
---------------------------SM.30/2000 of TALUK LAND BOARD, OTTAPALAM
REVN. PETITIONER: RESPONDENT:
-----------------------------------------
POOVATHINGAL CHANDRAN, VADANAMKURISSI, ONGALLUR II, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS:
--------------- ---------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. OTTAPPALAM TALUK AND BOARD, OTTAPPALAM.
GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.RAVINDRA BABU
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
K.P.BALACHANDRAN, J.
C. R. P. No.904 of 2005
-----------------------------------------------Dated this the 12th day of January, 2009
ORDER
Counsel for the petitioner is absent
and there is no representation on his behalf. This C.R.P is one of 2005 and it appears that the petitioner is not interested in having a considered order on the C.R.P. In the circumstances, I dismiss this C.R.P for default.
K.P.BALACHANDRAN, JUDGE
kns/-
POOVATHINGAL CHANDRAN
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
OTTAPPALAM TALUK AND BOARD OTTAPALAM
K.P.BALACHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
