The Kerala High Court declined to interfere with an order granting stay conditions for security deposit. The petitioner was granted one month to comply.
The petitioner was granted one month to comply with the conditions imposed in the impugned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 2ND JANUARY 2009 / 12TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 123 of 2009(M) -----------------------------------------PETITIONER(S): --------------------M/S CASCADE GELATI (P) LTD, PARAMARA SHOPPING COMPLEX, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, FRANCIS J. PALLAN. BY ADV. SRI.K.I.MAYANKUTTY MATHER SRI.P.P.RAMACHANDRAN
RESPONDENT(S):
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI C.K. GOVINDAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K. M. JOSEPH, J.
W.P.C. NO. 123 OF 2009 M
Dated this the 2nd January, 2009
JUDGMENT
Petitioner challenges Ext.P4. Ext.P4 is an order passed granting stay on condition that the petitioner remits Rs.2,50,000/= and furnishes sufficient security for the balance amount.
The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/=
K. M. JOSEPH, JUDGE
kbk.
// True Copy //
PS to Judge
M/S CASCADE GELATI (P) LTD
COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER (AA)
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS)
DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR)
K.M.Joseph
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
