Cicily v. Daniel
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed the second appeal on the ground that it abated due to the death of the first respondent without impleadment of legal representatives, based on the respondents' counsel's memo filed during the hearing.
What did the court decide?
The second appeal was dismissed as it had abated due to the death of the first respondent.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI
FRIDAY, THE 9TH JANUARY 2009 / 19TH POUSHA 1930
SA.No. 283 of 2002()
-------------------O.S.345/87 OF PRL.MUNSIFF'S COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM A.S.109/1993 OF THE DISTRICT COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
APPELLANT(S):
- CICILY, W/O DANIEL, PARITHAPPARA KEEZHIKUNNU VEEDU, CHOWALLOOR MURI, VILAPPIL VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
- BABU, S/O, DANIEL OF -DO-DO-
- CHRISTUDAS, S/O DANIEL OF -DO-
- LEYA D/O CICILY OF -DO-
- KOCHUMONY, S/O DASAN AND SON IN LAW OF DAVID OF -DO- -DO-
Parties & counsel
- appellant
CICILY, W/O DANIEL
- appellant
BABU, S/O DANIEL
- appellant
CHRISTUDAS, S/O DANIEL
- appellant
LEYA D/O CICILY
- appellant
KOCHUMONY, S/O DASAN
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court