Rappai v. Jino
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against order of attachment was allowed on the ground that the underlying debt was fully settled and received by plaintiff during pendency., disposing of the matter by setting aside the impugned order.
What did the court decide?
Order passed in I.A.175/1995 set aside; appeal disposed of.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI
FRIDAY, THE 9TH JANUARY 2009 / 19TH POUSHA 1930
AS.No. 26 of 1997
------------------I.A.175/95 in I.A.6426/94 in O.S.1152/94 OF SUB COURT, THRISSUR
APPELLANT(S):
- RAPPAI, S/O DEVASSY, MANJALLY HOUSE, NELLIKKUNNU DESOM, OLLUKKARA VILLAGE, THRISSUR.
- PAULSON, S/O RAPPAI, MENACHERY HOUSE, NELLIKUNNU DESOM, OLLUKKARRA VILLAGE, THRISSUR.
BY ADV. SRI.P.V.CHANDRA MOHAN
RESPONDENT(S):
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be allowed given that the debt was settled and amount received during pendency.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
RAPPAI, S/O DEVASSY
- appellant
PAULSON, S/O RAPPAI
- respondent
JINO & COMPANY
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court