The court dismissed an application for anticipatory bail. Pending surrender and regular bail application, the petitioner was directed to surrender within two weeks.
Anticipatory bail refused; directed to surrender within two weeks to seek regular bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR
FRIDAY, THE 3RD APRIL 2009 / 13TH CHAITHRA 1931
Bail Appl..No. 952 of 2009()
---------------------------CRIME NO. 9/2009 OF KONNI EXCISE RANGE,PATHANAMTHITTA
PETITIONER/ ACCUSED ---------------------------------------
THANKAMONI, W/O.SREEKUMAR,SREE BAHAVANAM HOUSE, MARUKARA PADINJATTETHIL, MAYALIKKARA, VALLIKODU VILLAGE, KOZHENCHERRY TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.M.T.SURESHKUMAR SRI.R.RANJITH
RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT
STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI M.S. BREEZ
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
V. RAMKUMAR, J.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
B.A. No. 952 of 2009
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this the 3rd day of April, 2009
O R D E R
In this Petition filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is the sole accused in Crime No.9/2009 of Konni Excise Range for offences punishable under Sections 8(1) and (2) of the Abkari Act for allegedly having been found in possession of 750 ml. of illicit arrack, seeks anticipatory Bail.
With the above observation this Application is disposed of .
V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.
mn.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail in a case involving possession of illicit arrack under the Abkari Act when the offence is deemed grave.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sukumari v. State of KeralaReferred¶4
Sukumari v. State of Kerala - 2001 (1) KLT 22
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Thankamoni
State of Kerala
V. Ramkumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
V. Ramkumar
Parties & counsel
