Allowed

Ramachandran v. State

Kerala HC3 Apr 2009Bail Appl./1590/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala granted anticipatory bail to three accused persons in Case No. 128/2009. The court directed the police to release them on bail with conditions for reporting, appearing for interrogation, not influencing witnesses, and surrendering for regular bail.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted for one month with conditions including bond of Rs. 25,000/sureties and compliance of reporting standards.

Ramachandran Vs State — Anticipatory Bail | Kerala HC (2009)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 3RD APRIL 2009 / 13TH CHAITHRA 1931

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 1590 of 2009()

¶6

----------------------------CRIME NO.128/2009 OF PEROORKADA POLICE STATION

¶7

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 3

¶8

¶9

RAMACHANDRAN S/O. P.KRISHNANKUTTY NAIR, AGED 32 YEARS, RESIDING AT KEESHE MAYYANADU VEEDU, TC 3/1942(1), PATTOM, LIC LANE,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

¶10

RATHEESH BABU S/O. THANKAPPAN NAIR, VIJAYA MANDIRAM, VELIYANOOR, VELLANADU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

¶11

BINU S/O. KRISHNANKUTTY, MARUNNUMOODU LAKSHAM VEEDU, MANNOORKKARA, KUKKIDI MURI, PARUTHIPALLY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

¶12

BY ADV. SRI.G.P.SHINOD SRI.RAM MOHAN.G. SRI.MANU V.

¶13

RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT/STATE & INVESTIGATING OFFICER

¶14

¶15

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶16

THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PEROORKADA POLICE STATION, OFFICE OF THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, PEROORKADA POLICE STATION COMPOUND, PEROORKADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

¶17

SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PEROORKADA POLICE STATION, PEROORKADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

¶18

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. M.S. BREEZ

¶19

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶20

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶21

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

¶22

B.A. No. 1590 of 2009

¶23

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this the 3^rd day of April, 2009

¶24

O R D E R

¶25

In this Petition filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioners who are accused Nos. 1 to 3 in Crime No.128/2009 of Peroorkada Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 323, 324, 342 and 308 read with section 34 I.P.C., seek anticipatory bail.

¶26

I heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶27

Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners and the other circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the officer-in-charge of the police station concerned to release the petitioners on bail for a period of one month in the event of their arrest in connection with the above case on each of them executing a bond for Rs. 25,000/(Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction to the said officer and subject to the following conditions: -

¶28

BA 1590/09 -2-

¶29

1. Petitioners shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

¶30

1. Petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation including custodial interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer.

¶31

1. Petitioners shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall they attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

¶32

1. Petitioners shall not commit any offence while on bail.

¶33

1. Petitioners shall surrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail in the meanwhile.

¶34

If the petitioners commit breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to them shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶35

This application is allowed as above.

¶36

V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.

¶37

mn.

Ramachandran v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramachandran v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.v.Kunhippa Vs Circle Inspector of Police, Ponnani

Junid T.S. Vs State of Kerala

Pradeep and Another Vs State of Kerala

Thankamoni Vs State of Kerala

Alikhan Vs State of Kerala

Ammed Haji Vs State of Kerala