Petitioner, a second accused facing charges under Section 447 IPC and related provisions, sought anticipatory bail. The court denied anticipatory bail but directed surrender for interrogation before Magistrate consideration of regular bail application.
Petitioner directed to surrender for interrogation on 14-April or 15-April 2009; petition disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR
FRIDAY, THE 3RD APRIL 2009 / 13TH CHAITHRA 1931
Bail Appl..No. 1540 of 2009()
----------------------------CRIME NO.33/2009 OF NADAPURAM POLICE STATION
PETITIONER/2ND ACCUSED
AMMED HAJI, AGED 63 YEARS, S/O.SOOPY, THAIVAHA PARAMBATH, KALLACHI P.O., VADAKARA TALUK, CALICUT DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.ANTONY MATHEW
RESPONDENT(S): STATE
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI M.S.BREEZ
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
V. RAMKUMAR, J.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
B.A. No. 1540 of 2009
O R D E R
Petitioner who is the 2nd accused in Crime No.33/2009 of Nadapuram Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 447 I.P.C. and 3(2)(a) of The Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, seeks anticipatory bail.
This petition is disposed of as above.
V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.
mn.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail is maintainable in offences under Section 447 IPC and Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act.
Whether the petitioner should surrender for interrogation before seeking regular bail.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ammed Haji
State
V. Ramkumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
