Noufel v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Kerala rejected the petitioner's bail application under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C., holding that grave offences were involved and no reason existed to grant anticipatory bail.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH MARCH 2009 / 27TH PHALGUNA 1930
Bail Appl..No. 303 of 2009() --------------------------------------CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
PETITIONER (S):
-------------------------NOUFEL, AGED 23 YEARS, S/O. MUHAMMED, IQBAL HOUSE, KASARGOD BALLA BEACH, P.O. KANHANGAD, HOSDURG TALUK,KASARGOD DISTRICT.
BY ADV. MR.SUNNY MATHEW
RESPONDENT(S):
-----------------------STATE OF KERALA, THTOUGH THE S.I.G. CBCID, KOZHIKODE, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OFKERALA, ERNAKULAM.
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR.K.S.SIVAKUMAR
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner facing arrest for offences under the Abkari Act involving grave offences?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Noufel
- respondent
State of Kerala
Coram
V. Ramkumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court