Syam.S v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court declined to grant anticipatory bail. Instead, it ordered the petitioner to surrender between 23-25 March 2009 for interrogation before obtaining regular bail from the Magistrate.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner directed to surrender for interrogation between 23-25-3-2009; thereafter to seek regular bail from Magistrate.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 17TH MARCH 2009 / 26TH PHALGUNA 1930
Bail Appl..No. 662 of 2009()
---------------------------CRMP.94/2009 of D.C. & SESSIONS COURT,KOLLAM CRIME NO.6/209 OF KOLLAM EAST POLICE STATION
PETITIONER/IST ACCUSED
SYAM.S., S/O.SAHADEVAN, AGED 28 YEARS, PANAVILA, KARUNALAYA, ASRAMOM, KOLLAM.
BY ADV. SRI.S.SUDHEESHKAR SRI. K.SIJU
RESPONDENT(S): ---------------
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOLLAM EAST POLICE STATION THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in a case involving offences under sections 420, 465, 468, 471 read with section 34 IPC.
Whether the petitioner should be permitted to surrender for interrogation before seeking regular bail.
Whether regular bail can be considered by the Magistrate on the same day after surrender.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SYAM.S.
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
V.RAMKUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court