Dismissed

Vinod Kumar v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC18 Mar 2009Bail Appl./135/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicant accused under Sections 489-B and 489-C I.P.C. sought anticipatory bail. Court held anticipatory bail not grantable in this nature but permitted surrender for interrogation before magistrate considers regular bail application.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to surrender for interrogation between 23.03.2009 and 25.03.2009 and produce before Magistrate for regular bail consideration.

Vinod Kumar Vs State of Kerala — Cheque Dishonour | Kerala HC (2009)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH MARCH 2009 / 27TH PHALGUNA 1930

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 135 of 2009() ----------------------------

¶6

CRIME NO. 199/CR/SII/07 of CBCID-C.F.-S.I. G-II, ERNAKULAM

¶7

APPLICANTS/ACCUSED:-

¶8

¶9

VINOD KUMAR, S/O. PARAMESWARAN, AMBATTUPARAMBIL HOUSE, POOLANI DESOM, MELUR P.O., MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

¶10

BY ADV. MR. P.VIJAYA BHANU MR. VIPIN NARAYAN

¶11

RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT:-

¶12

¶13

STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTING THE DETECTIVE INSPECTOR, C.B.C.I.D., ERNAKULAM.

¶14

ADV. MR. K.S. SIVAKUMAR, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶15

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶16

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶17

Bail Application No. 135 of 2009

¶18

---------------------------------Dated this the 18^th day of March, 2009.

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

Petitioner who is the accused in Crime No. 199/CR/SII/07 of CBCID – C.F.- S.I. G-II, Ernakulam for offences punishable under Sections 489 B and 489-C I.P.C., seeks anticipatory bail.

¶21

The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application.

¶22

Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this

¶23

nature. But at the same time, I am inclined to permit the petitioner to surrender before the Investigating Officer for the purpose of interrogation and then to have his application for bail considered by the Magistrate having jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petitioner shall surrender before the investigating officer on any day between 23.03.2009 and 25.03.2009 for the purpose of interrogation and recovery of incriminating material, if any. The petitioner shall thereafter be produced on the same day before the Magistrate who shall consider and dispose of his application for regular bail preferably on the same date on which it is filed.

¶24

This petition is disposed of as above.

¶25

Dated this the 18^th day of March, 2009.

¶26

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.

¶27

Vinod Kumar v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinod Kumar v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Syam.S Vs State of Kerala

Sooraj Vs State of Kerala

V.C.Gangadhara Prasad Vs Sub Inspector of Police

Lonappan Vs State of Kerala

Noufel Vs State of Kerala

Sathyabhama Vs State of Kerala