K.P.Abdul Kalam v. the Secy.Rta
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition directed the respondent to consider an application for varying bus running timings and dispose of it within three months, dispensing with prior notice.
What did the court decide?
Directed the respondent to consider Ext.P1 application and dispose of it within three months; dispensed with notice to the respondent without prejudice.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN
FRIDAY, THE 1ST FEBRUARY 2008 / 12TH MAGHA 1929
WP(C).No. 3780 of 2008(Y)
PETITIONER:
ABDUL KALAM, KARUKASSRIL HOUSE, AROOKUTTY P.O., CHERTHALA.
BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN
RESPONDENT:
THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ALAPPUZHA.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.I.V. PRAMOD.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ABDUL KALAM
- respondent
THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ALAPPUZHA
Coram
THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court