In this writ petition, Assistant Engineers challenged the seniority list and invoked revisional powers. The court disposed of the petition, directing the first respondent to consider Exhibits P2 to P5 and pass orders within two months.
Directed the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Exhibits P2 to P5 within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 18TH JANUARY 2008 / 28TH POUSHA 1929
WP(C).No. 2196 of 2008(J)
PETITIONERS:
RESPONDENTS:
BY GOVT.PLEADER SHRI BEJOY CHANDRAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
V.GIRI,J.
W.P.(C)No.2196 OF 2008
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2008
J U D G M E N T
Aggrieved by Exhibit P1 final seniority list in the post of Assistant Engineer, petitioners have preferred revisions invoking the power under section 27B of Part II KS & SSR before
the first respondent.
respondent to consider and pass orders on Exhibits P2 to P5, in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
V.GIRI, JUDGE.
dsn
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the first respondent should consider and pass orders on Exhibits P2 to P5 within two months?
B.Padmajan and others
State of Kerala, represented by Principal Secretary, Public Works Department
Chief Engineer, P.W.D. Administration
V.Giri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
