Smt.v.M.Margret and Another v. K.K.Sasidharan
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt case, the High Court noted that partial pension arrears had been remitted. Finding no justification to proceed further as the writ petition matter was effectively disposed of, the court closed the contempt proceedings and advised petitioners to pursue claims for remaining dues separately.
What did the court decide?
The contempt proceedings are closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI
THURSDAY, THE 17TH JANUARY 2008 / 27TH POUSHA 1929
Con.Case(C).No. 673 of 2007(S)
-----------------------------{IN OP.15762/2006 OF THIS COURT} ....................
PETITIONERS:
- SMT. V.M.MARGRET, AGED 65 YEARS, W/O. C.A.ANTONY, CHEKKAMATH HOUSE, THOMASPURAM, MARADU WEST P.O., MARADU VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
- SRI. A.R.ANTONY, AGED 76 YEARS, ANCHANICKAL HOUSE, BAGATSINGH ROAD, THAIKOODAM, VYTTILA P.O., COCHIN-682 019.
BY ADVS. SRI.M.V.JOY SRI.T.K.SAJEEV
RESPONDENTS:
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt proceedings should be closed after remission of pension contribution.
Whether the court should continue contempt proceedings despite pending monetary disputes.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SMT. V.M. MARGRET
- petitioner
SRI. A.R. ANTONY
- respondent
K.K. SASIDHARAN
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court