Disposed

Ravindran v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC11 Jan 2008Crl.MC/107/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking bail. It permitted the accused-surrendered petitioner to file an application for regular bail within two weeks, to be considered on merits notwithstand ing pending non-bailable warrants.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to surrender and file bail application within two weeks; bail to be considered on merits disregarding non-bailable warrants.

Ravindran Vs State of Kerala — Bail and Remand | Kerala HC (2008)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 11TH JANUARY 2008 / 21ST POUSHA 1929

¶5

Crl.MC.No. 107 of 2008()

¶6

-----------------------CP.111/2007 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, KARUNAGAPPALLY

¶7

PETITIONER: ACCUSED:

¶8

¶9

RAVINDRAN, AGED 52 YEARS, S/O.GOVINDAN, PAINUMMOOTTIL HOUSE, MANAPPALLY NORTH MURI, PAVUMPA VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPPALLY TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

¶10

BY ADV. SRI.BECHU KURIAN THOMAS SRI.ROSHEN.D.ALEXANDER

¶11

RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT:

¶12

¶13

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶14

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.K.S.SIVAKUMAR

¶15

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶16

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶17

= = = = = = = = = = = = = Crl.M.C.No.107 of 2008

¶18

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 11^th day of January, 2008

¶19

ORDER

¶20

Petitioner, who is the accused in C.P.No.111 of 2007 on the files of J.F.C.M, Karunagapally for offences punishable under Sections 55(a) of the Abkari Act, seeks a direction to the said Magistrate to release the petitioner on bail on the date of his surrender itself.

¶21

Admittedly non bailable warrants of arrest are pending against the petitioner. The circumstances under which those non bailable warrants of arrest came to be issued against the petitioner are not discernible to this Court. It is only proper that the petitioner surrenders before the learned Magistrate and seeks regular bail.

¶22

Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Case is disposed of permitting the petitioner to surrender before the learned Magistrate and file an application for regular bail within a period of two weeks from today. In case the petitioner complies with the above condition, his bail application shall be considered and disposed of on merits preferably on the same date on which it is filed not withstanding the pendency of non bailable warrants, if any, against him.

¶23

V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE

¶24

Ravindran v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravindran v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandrankutty Vs G.Ramachandran

Johnson Dominic Vs Sulaiman & Another

S.Gopalakrishnan Vs State of Kerala

Ajitha Pradeep Vs v.O.Joseph

Ranil Vs Vineetha Chandran

Roy Vs State of Kerala