Roy v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner, 1st accused in IPC 395 case, sought direction to Magistrate to grant bail on surrender. Court allowed surrender but directed regular bail application within two weeks.
What did the court decide?
Permitted petitioner to surrender, file regular bail application within two weeks; bail application to be disposed on merits preferably same day of filing.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR
FRIDAY, THE 11TH JANUARY 2008 / 21ST POUSHA 1929
Crl.MC.No. 106 of 2008()
-----------------------CRIME NO.140 OF 2003 OF KURUPPAMPADY POLICE STATION.
PETITIONER: 1ST ACCUSED
ROY, S/O ABRAHAM, KAIPPALLIL HOUSE, IRAMALLUR VILLAGE, KOTHAMANGALAM.
BY ADV. SRI.R.BINDU (SASTHAMANGALAM) SRI.PRASANTH M.P
RESPONDENTS: STATE
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, against whom non-bailable warrants are pending, can be permitted to apply for bail on surrender.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ROY, S/O ABRAHAM
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
V. RAMKUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court