Ranil v. Vineetha Chandran
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court allowed a criminal miscellaneous petition challenging the cancellation of bail in a domestic violence case involving non-compliance with maintenance orders.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner allowed to seek bail on surrender and deposit of Rs. 6,000 towards arrears of maintenance within two weeks.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR
FRIDAY, THE 11TH JANUARY 2008 / 21ST POUSHA 1929
Crl.MC.No. 101 of 2008()
-----------------------ST.376/2007 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-I, HARIPAD
PETITIONER: IST RESPONDENT
RANIL, S/O.SASIDHARAN, SATHYA MANDIRAM, KARAPPURAM (P.O), EDAKKARA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.R.BINDU (SASTHAMANGALAM) SRI.M.SUNILKUMAR
RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT & STATE
- VINEETHA CHANDRAN, D/O.VIJAYAN NAIR, KALATHILPARAMBIL VEEDU, MAHADEVIKADU MURI, KARTHIKAPPALLY VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether bail bond else cancelled by the Magistrate can be revived on deposit of arrears of maintenance after surrendering and filing an application for bail.
Whether arrest/warrant issued for disobedience of ex-parte maintenance order can be quashed if the underlying appeal is pending.
Whether conditions can be imposed for release on bail in a domestic violence maintenance case involving alleged non-compliance.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RANIL
- respondent
VINEETHA CHANDRAN
Coram
V.RAMKUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court