Maram Veettil Sobha v. S.M.Vijayanand
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt proceedings dropped after the Director of Panchayath rejected the petitioner's claim via an order dated 11.1.2008.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI
MONDAY, THE 14TH JANUARY 2008 / 24TH POUSHA 1929
Con.Case(C).No. 1813 of 2007(S) ------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.24641/2005 Dated 09/09/2005
PETITIONER/PETITIONER
MARAM VEETTIL SOBHA, W/O. LATE VASU, AGED 41 YEARS, KODANCHERI P.O., PURAMERI VIA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.K.P.SUDHEER
RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS
LOCAL ADMINISTRATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.NANDAKUMAR
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/01/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
V.GIRI, J
Contempt Case (C).1813/2007
Dated this the 14th day of January, 2008
JUDGMENT
Learned senior Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that pursuant to Annexure-A1 judgment, an order has been passed by the Director of Panchayath on 11.1.2008, rejecting the claim of the petitioner. Copy of the said order has been served on the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well. In view of the above, Contempt of Court Case proceedings are dropped. I make it clear that this will not stand in the way of the petitioner taking appropriate steps in relation to the order dated 11.1.2008.
V.GIRI, Judge
mrcs
Maram Veetil Sobha
S.M. Vijayanand
P.Panjiakshan Pillai
V. Giri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court