Disposed
Kuttan Nair v. K.R.Muraleedharan and Another
Kerala HCCon.Case(C)/1035/2008
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
In a contempt case regarding failure to communicate a pension order, the court accepted that the petitioner received revised orders sanctioning pensionary benefits on 6.12.2008. The case was closed without substantive adjudication of the underlying rights. The petitioner was directed to receive a copy of the order.
What did the court decide?
Closed contempt proceedings; directed communication of revised order dated 6.12.2008 to the petitioner.