George v. Rdo
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala disposed of a writ petition filed regarding alleged pollution caused by the respondents. The Court directed the petitioner to approach the third respondent (Kerala Pollution Control Board) if grievance persists for prompt action with notice to affected parties.
What did the court decide?
The petitioner was directed to approach the third respondent (KPCB) if any grievance remains for prompt action.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH
THURSDAY, THE 12TH JULY 2007 / 21ST ASHADHA 1929
WP(C).No. 902 of 2004(G)
-----------------------------------
PETITIONER:
-------------------
GEORGE, THADATHIL HOUSE, KILLANNUR VILLAGE, CHOTTUPARA DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.P.R.SHAJI.
RESPONDENTS:
------------------------
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's grievances regarding pollution caused by respondent No.6 and No.7 are viable.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
GEORGE
- respondent
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR
- respondent
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THRISSUR
- respondent
THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, KERALA POLLUTATION CONTROL BOARD, THRISSUR
- respondent
THE GEOLOGIST, THRISSUR
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court