This contempt case was closed due to an enlargement of time granted. The court directed that if amounts remain unpaid, interest at 12% applies and the responsible officer is personally liable.
Contempt case closed; conditional direction for 12% interest and personal liability of delaying officer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH
WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH JULY 2007 / 20TH ASHADHA 1929
Con.Case(C).No. 1035 of 2007(S)
--------------------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN OP.2750/2003
PETITIONER:
------------------
THE ERNAKULAM URBAN CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.7, RAVIPURAM ROAD, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, RAJESWARY, AGED 52 YEARS, W/O. ARAVINDAKSHAN KARTHA.
BY ADV. SRI.V.G.ARUN SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR
RESPONDENTS:
-----------------------
P.A. MATHEW, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN,AGED NOT KNOWN, SENIOR POST MASTER, ERNAKULAM HEAD POST OFFICE, COCHIN-11.
BY ADV. SRI. P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR, ASSISTANT S.G.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/07/2007,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
KURIAN JOSEPH , J
==================================
CONTEMPT CASE (C) NO. 1035 OF 2007
==================================
Dated this the th day of July, 2007.
JUDGMENT
In view of the enlargement of time granted in I.A No. 7145/2007 this C.C is closed, however making it clear that in case the amounts are not paid within the said period, the petitioner will be entitled to interest at the rate of 12% and the officer responsible for the delay shall be personally liable for the same.
KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE.
rv
THE ERNAKULAM URBAN CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.
P.A. MATHEW
KURIAN JOSEPH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
