C.R.Chandra Babu v. Ksrtc
Case brief
What is this about?
In a writ petition concerning unpaid salary, increments, and benefits, the Court declined to examine merits and directed the respondent corporation to consider petitioner's representations within two months.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the respondent to consider petitioner's representations on unpaid salary and benefits within two months of the judgment.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
MONDAY, THE 26TH MARCH 2007 / 5TH CHAITHRA 1929 WP(C).No. 10306 of 2007(B) --------------------------
PETITIONER:
C.R.CHANDRA BABU, CHARGEMAN GRADE II (GENERAL), K.S.R.T.C. CENTRAL WORKS, PAPPANAMCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.ANANDARAJAN.N SRI.K.K.MANGALANANDAN
RESPONDENTS:
- THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-23.
- THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (ADMINISTRATION), K.S.R.T.C., TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-23.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Kerala High Court should dispose of the writ petition regarding unpaid salary and benefits without considering merits.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C.R.CHANDRA BABU
- respondent
THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION
Coram
PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court