Writ petition filed by a Panchayat secretary regarding a delay in issuing a charge certificate. The court followed its own prior judgment holding such late issuance illegal.
Ext.P2 (the surcharge certificate) is quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
FRIDAY, THE 23RD MARCH 2007 / 2ND CHAITHRA 1929
WP(C).No. 5719 of 2006(E)
PETITIONER:
PHILOMINA. P.T., SECRETARY (SPECIAL GRADE), MEENACHIL GRAMA PANCHAYATH, P.O. EDAMATTOM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.M.V.BOSE SRI.VINOD MADHAVAN SMT.NISHA BOSE
RESPONDENTS:
BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.K.J.MOHAMMED ANSAR
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/03/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
APPENDIX(W.P.C.NO.5719 OF 2006)
PETITIONER'S EXTS.:
EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE SURCHARGE NOTICE DATED 28.4.2004 ISSUED BY JOINT DIRECTOR OF LOCAL FUND AUDIT.
EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE SURCHARGE CERTIFICATE DATED 19.11.2004.
PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No.5719 of 2006
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated: 23rd March, 2007
JUDGMENT
Heard both sides.
PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE
srd
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the quashing of a certificate issued beyond the prescribed period is justified under existing court precedents.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.C.No.23800 of 2003Followed¶2
Philomina. P.T.
State of Kerala
The Director, Local Fund Audit, Thiruvananthapuram
The Deputy Director, Local Fund Audit, Kottayam
Pius C. KuriaKose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Pius C. KuriaKose
Parties & counsel
