The petitioner is challenging recovery proceedings initiated for recovery of compensation awarded against petitioner's father who is 4th respondent in the O.P. According to the petitioner, the property was partly gifted in favour of the petitioner by 4th respondent and since 4th respondent is not the sole owner of the property, it cannot be sold for recovery ofarrears due from 4th respondent. I do not think there is any need for this court to enter any finding on this issue because if petitioner has right in the property, petitioner can file a claim petition under Section 46 of the Revenue Recovery Act before the second respondent. If petitioner has any right over the property, the second respondent shall sell defaulter's undivided share or get the property partitioned and sell only the portion belonging to the 4th respondent. Since stay was granted by this court, if petitioner or the 4th respondent wants to settle liability, an opportunity can be granted for settling the liability without any interest provided the amount is paid before 31.12.2007. If petitioner or the 4th respondent does not settle liability, petitioner should file claim petition within the said time and if claim petition
