M.P.Jayarajan v. Mr. Subair
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt of court case, the petitioner submitted that the impugned order was complied with. The court marked the matter as closed.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case was closed as the order was complied with.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K.DENESAN FRIDAY, THE 16TH MARCH 2007 / 25TH PHALGUNA 1928 Con.Case(C).No. 359 of 2007(S) -----------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.31840/2006 Dated 30/11/2006 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER
-------------------------------------M.P.JAYARAJAN, S/O NARAYANAN, AGED 59 YEARS, ASSISTANT ENGINEER(RTD.), KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, ELECTRICAL SECTION AZHEEKODE,RESIDING AT SAPHALYA, VELLACHAL, P.O.MAKRERI, PIN-670 622, KANNUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.P.M.PAREETH
RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENT
----------------------MR, SUBAIR, (FATHER'SNAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) SECRETARY, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VIDHYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY SC SHRI. K.S. ANIL
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/03/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K.K.DENESAN, J.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.P.JAYARAJAN
- respondent
MR. SUBAIR
Coram
K.K.DENESAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court