The court disposed of an anticipatory bail application by observing the alleged offense was pre-planned. Instead of granting bail, the court directed petitioners to surrender and seek regular bail within two weeks.
Direction to surrender and seek regular bail within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 11TH JANUARY 2007 / 21ST PAUSHA 1928
Bail Appl..No. 43 of 2007()
--------------------------CRIME NO.632/06 OF OTTAPPALAM POLICE STATION.
: PETITIONERS/ACCUSED
BY ADV. SRI.SANTHEEP ANKARATH
RESPONDENTS: STATE
STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTING THE SUB INSPECTOR, OTTAPALAM POLICE STATION.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SHRI JAI GEORGE
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
V. RAMKUMAR, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
BAIL APPLICATION NO.43 OF 2007
- - - - - - - - - ----------------------- - - - - - - DATED THIS THE 11th DAY OF JANUARY, 2007
O R D E R
Petitioners who are accused 1, 3 and 4 in Crime No.632/06 of
Ottappalam Police Station for offences punishable under sections 341, 323 and 326 read with section 34 IPC, seeks anticipatory bail.
With this direction, this petition is disposed of .
dsn
V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in a pre-planned assault case involving grievous hurt.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohan
Dileep
Pradeep
State of Kerala
V.Ramkumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
