Allowed

Kaniyal Chandrika v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC11 Jan 2007Bail Appl./100/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala granted anticipatory bail to accused persons charged under Section 498A read with Section 34 I.P.C. in a domestic dispute case. The court imposed specific conditions regarding reporting, interrogation, and surrendering for regular bail.

What did the court decide?

Granted bail for one month with bond of Rs. 10,000/- and two sureties, subject to conditions of reporting, interrogation, non-interference, and surrender.

Kaniyal Chandrika Vs State of Kerala — Matrimonial and Divorce | Kerala HC (2007)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 11TH JANUARY 2007 / 21ST PAUSHA 1928

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 100 of 2007()

¶6

¶7

Crime No.227/06 of Chokli Police Station

¶8

: PETITIONERS/ACCUSED:

¶9

¶10

KANIYAL CHANDRIKA, W/O.JAYARAMAN, AGED 50 YEARS, EZHIYODU P.O., KUNJIMANGALAM, KANNUR.

¶11

JAYARAMAN, S/O. NARAYANAN, AGED 55 YEARS, EZHIYODU P.O., KUNJIMANGALAM, KANNUR.

¶12

JAYARAJAN SHARAVANAN, AGED 29 YEARS, EZHIYODU P.O., KUNJIMANGALAM, KANNUR.

¶13

BY ADV. SRI.SOJAN MICHEAL

¶14

RESPONDENT: COMPLAINANT:

¶15

¶16

STATE OF KERALA (S.H.O.CHOKLI POLICE STATION), REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶17

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SHRI. P.N. SUKUMARAN

¶18

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶19

V.Ramkumar, J. ======================== B.A.No. 100 of 2007

¶20

========================

¶21

Dated this the 11^th day of January, 2007.

¶22

ORDER

¶23

Petitioners, who are accused Nos. 2 to 4 in Crime No.227 of 2006 of Chokli Police Station for an offence punishable under Section 498A read with Section 34 I.P.C., seek anticipatory bail. The marriage between Vijeesha, the de facto complainant and the first accused in the case took place on 19.2.2006. The present case arose out of a private complaint preferred by the de facto complainant.

¶24

I heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶25

Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners and the other circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the officer-in-charge of the police station concerned to release the petitioners on bail for a period of one month in the event of their arrest in connection with the above case on each of them executing a bond for Rs. 10,000/- with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the said officer and

¶26

BA 100/07

¶27

-: 2 :-

¶28

subject to the following conditions:

¶29

Petitioners 2 and 3 shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

¶30

Petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer.

¶31

Petitioners shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall they attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

¶32

Petitioners shall not commit any offence while on bail.

¶33

Petitioners shall surrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail in the meanwhile.

¶34

If the petitioners commit breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to them shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶35

This application is allowed as above.

V.RAMKUMAR,

JUDGE.

ess 11/1

BA 100/07 -: 3 :-

Kaniyal Chandrika v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kaniyal Chandrika v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Padmaja Vs State of Kerala

Chinchu Kareem Vs S.I. of Police

Satheeshan Vs State of Kerala

Binu Vs Sub Inspector of Police,Sakthikulangara.

Mohanan Vs State of Kerala

Jayan Vs Circle Inspector of Police & Another