Binu v. Sub Inspector of Police,Sakthikulangara.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed the application for anticipatory bail in a theft case. The court refused immediate bail due to insufficient evidence of false implication and directed the petitioner to surrender for interrogation within a specified period before filing a regular bail application.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner directed to surrender for interrogation between 15.1.2007 and 18.1.2007; Petition disposed of.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR
THURSDAY, THE 11TH JANUARY 2007 / 21ST PAUSHA 1928
Bail Appl..No. 34 of 2007() --------------------------Crime No.435/06 of Sakthikulangara Police Station
: PETITIONER/4TH ACCUSED --------------------------------------BINU, S/O.NARAYANAN PILLAI, BINU BHAVAN, KALEEKKAL KADAPPURAM, MUNDACKAL EAST, MUNDACKAL VILLAGE, KOLLAM.
BY ADV. SRI.M.V.THAMBAN
RESPONDENT: COMPLAINANT
SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SAKTHIKULANGARA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SHRI. P.N.SUKUMARAN
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail can be granted immediately in a theft case where false implication is not yet established.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Binu
- respondent
Sub Inspector of Police, Sakthikulangara (Public Prosecutor)
Coram
V. Ramkumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court