Allowed

Jaffer v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC12 Jan 2007Bail Appl./111/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala granted bail to the second accused in a criminal case under the Abkari Act for possession of illicit arrack, directing execution of a bond and imposing reporting and restraint conditions. The application was allowed as above.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted to the petitioner upon execution of a bond for Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties each for the like amount, subject to reporting and other conditions.

Jaffer Vs State of Kerala — Cheque Dishonour | Kerala HC (2007)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 12TH JANUARY 2007 / 22ND PAUSHA 1928

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 111 of 2007() ---------------------------CRMP.5759/2006 of J.M.F.C.,RANNI Crime no.155/06 of Perunadu Police Station

¶6

: PETITIONER/2ND ACCUSED

¶7

¶8

JAFFER, AGED 39, S/O.IBRAHIM, (IN FACT, SON-IN-LAW OF IBRAHIM), MARUTHIMOOTTIL, LAHA, PERUNADU.

¶9

BY ADV. SRI.C.T.RAVIKUMAR SMT.K.S.SAIRA SRI.A.ANILKUMAR

¶10

RESPONDENT: COMPLAINANT

¶11

¶12

STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA.

¶13

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SHRI. JAI GEORGE

¶14

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶15

V.Ramkumar, J. ======================== B.A.No.111 of 2007

¶16

========================

¶17

Dated this the 12^th day of January, 2007.

¶18

ORDER

¶19

In this Petition filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is the second accused in Crime No.155 of 2006 of Perunadu Police Station for offences punishable under Sec.8(1) and (2) of the Abkari Act for having been found in possession of three liters of illicit arrack, seeks his enlargement on bail.

¶20

I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶21

Having regard to the nature of the offences, the duration of judicial custody of the petitioner and the other circumstances of the case etc., I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his executing a bond for Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the J.F.C.M., Ranny and subject to the following conditions:

¶22

The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

¶23

BA 111/07

¶24

-: 2 :-

¶25

The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

¶26

The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

¶27

If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶28

This application is allowed as above.

V.RAMKUMAR,

JUDGE.

ess 12/1

BA 111/07 -: 3 :-

Jaffer v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jaffer v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Binu Vs Sub Inspector of Police,Sakthikulangara.

Mohanan Vs State of Kerala

Jayan Vs Circle Inspector of Police & Another

Aniyan @ Rajan Vs S.I. of Police,Thrikkodithanam

P.K.Sreejith Vs State of Kerala

Baiju Vs State of Kerala