Dismissed

N.Priya Kumari v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC15 Dec 2006WP(C)/26802/2006

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala directed the State to consider the petitioner's revision petitions after the court found the alternate remedy invoked, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition for that reason. The matter was remanded to the first respondent for action within two months.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to pursue alternate remedy; first respondent to consider revision petitions after hearing all parties within two months.

N.Priya Kumari Vs State of Kerala — Service and Employment | Kerala HC (2006)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 15TH DECEMBER 2006 / 24TH AGRAHAYANA 1928

¶5

WP(C).No. 26802 of 2006(N)

¶6

-------------------------------------

¶7

PETITIONER:

¶8

---------------------

¶9

N. PRIYA KUMARI, W/O. SOMAN, AGED 36 YEARS, RESIDING AT MANIMANDIRAM, VENMANI WEST P.O., CHENGANNUR (L.G.(HINDI) PART-TIME TEACHER, D.B.U.P.S.)

¶10

BY ADV. SRI.SAJITH KUMAR V.

¶11

RESPONDENTS:

¶12

---------------------

¶13

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, TRIVANDRUM.

¶14

2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, O/O. THE DPI, TRIVANDRUM.

¶15

3. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ATTINGAL.

¶16

4. DISTRICT ECUCATIONAL OFFICER, KUTTANAD.

¶17

5. TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, NANDANCODE, TRIVANDRUM.

¶18

6. C.P. GIRIJA KUMARI, U.P.S.A., D.B.H.S. VAMANAPURAM.

¶19

7. SUMANGALA DEVI, TOTTAYIL HOUSE, THRUTHY P.O., CHANGANASSERY.

¶20

R1 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER (SHRI T.T. MUHAMMED)

¶21

BY ADV. SRI.S.SUBHASH CHAND SRI.PHILIP T.VARGHESE SRI.THOMAS T.VARGHESE

¶22

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶23

APPENDIX IN W.P.(C) NO.26802 OF 2006 N

¶24

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

¶25

EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE REVERSION ORDER NO.ROC.3228/04/G EDN. DATED 22.7.2005 ISSUED BY FIFTH RESPONDENT TO PETITIONER.

¶26

EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO.B6-5771/05/L.DIS. DATED 23.11.2005 ISSUED BY THIRD RESPONDENT TO PETITIONER.

¶27

EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO.ROC 3228/04 DATED 15.12.2005 ISSUED BY THE FIFTH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.

¶28

EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 7/06 SUBMITTED BEFORE SECOND RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER.

¶29

EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.K.DIS.F.(3)/91790/05 DATED 2.8.06 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT TO PETITIONER.

¶30

EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION DATED 28.9.06 SUBMITTED BEFORE 1ST RESPONDENT BY PETITIONER.

¶31

EXT.P7 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 28.9.06 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT BY PETITIONER.

¶32

EXT.P8 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDING NO.ROC NO.8031/05 EDN. (2) DATED 20.10.2005 ISSUED BY THE FIFTH RESPONDENT.

¶33

RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:

¶34

EXT.R7(A) TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 4.4.2006 IN WP(C) NO.10288/06 PASSED BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT.

¶35

EXT.R7(B) TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER BEARING NO.ROC/2653/03/EDN. DATED 9.10.2006.

//TRUE COPY//

PS TO JUDGE

K. M. JOSEPH, J.

------------------------------------W.P.C. NO. 26802 OF 2006 N

¶40

Dated this the 15^th December, 2006

¶41

JUDGMENT

¶42

Petitioner challenges Exts.P2 and P5. As against the same,

¶43

petitioner has preferred Exts.P6 and P7 purporting to be Revision Petitions under Rule 92 of Chapter XIV A KER. In view of the fact that the petitioner has already invoked the alternate remedy, I feel that the petitioner should be relegated to the pursuit of the alternate remedy. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing first respondent to consider Exts.P6 and P7 in accordance with law, after hearing petitioner, respondents 5 to 7 and any other affected party, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment.

¶44

K. M. JOSEPH, JUDGE

¶45

kbk.

N.Priya Kumari v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N.Priya Kumari v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr.M.K.Manoj Vs Prof. (Dr.) Meenu Hariharan

Satheesh Kumar K.A. Vs Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskri

K.O.Annie Vs State of Kerala

Maya S Vs Dy Director of Educaation,Kottayam

The Manager Vs Director of Public Instruction

Poulose Vs State of Kerala