Allowed

Mohanakurup v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC8 Dec 2006Bail Appl./7190/2006

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala granted bail to a second accused arrested for under the Abkari Act for possession of arrack. The court relied on the proviso to Section 167(1) Cr.P.C., noting the public prosecutor admitted no charge sheet was filed after 60 days of custody.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on execution of a bond for Rs. 20,000 with two solvent sureties for Rs. 20,000 each.

Mohanakurup Vs State of Kerala — Cheque Dishonour | Kerala HC (2006)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 8TH DECEMBER 2006 / 17TH AGRAHAYANA 1928 Bail Appl..No. 7190 of 2006() ----------------------------CMP.4896/2006 of J.M.F.C.,THIRUVALLA CR.NO.25/06 OF MALLAPPALLY EXCISE RANGE. ....................

¶4

PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 IN CR.NO.25/2006

¶5

----------------------------------------------------MOHANAKURUP, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O. BHASKARAKURUP, MUNDUKANDAMKOLEDATHU VEEDU, KANNAMTHANAM VILLAGE, MALLAPPALLY. BY ADV. SRI.P.GOPAKUMARAN NAIR SRI.C.S.DIAS SRI.AJITH MURALI

¶6

RESPONDENT: COMPLAINANT IN CR.NO.25/2006 --------------------------------------------------------STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶7

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SHRI P.N.SUKUMARAN

¶8

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶9

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶10

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

¶11

BAIL APPLICATION NO. 7190 OF 2006

¶12

- - - - - - - - - ----------------------- - - - - - -

¶13

DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2006

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

Petitioner who is the second accused in Cr.No.25/06 of Mallappally Excise Range for offences punishable under sections 8(1) and 8(2) of the Abkari Act for allegedly having been found in possession of 8 liters of arrack on 16.9.2006 and who was arrested on 8.10.2006, seeks bail.

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor admitted that no charge sheet has been filed even after 60 days of detention of the petitioner in judicial custody. If so, by virtue of the proviso to section 167(1) Cr.P.C., the petitioner is entitled to bail as of right. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his executing a bond for Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the J.F.C.M.-I, Thiruvalla and subject to the following conditions:

¶17

Petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

¶18

The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

¶19

B.A.NO.7190/06

¶20

Page numbers

¶21

The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

¶22

If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶23

This application is allowed as above.

¶24

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.

¶25

dsn

Mohanakurup v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohanakurup v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ansari @ Athu Vs State of Kerala

Sreemurali Vs the State of Kerala

Prasad.v. Vs the State of Kerala & Another

C.Jayachandran Vs State of Kerala and Another

V.C.Mubasheer Vs State of Kerala

Hasan Vs State of Kerala