The High Court of Kerala dismissed an anticipatory bail application filed by Prasad V. The court held that since no crime was registered against the petitioner and he was not required by the police, the apprehension of arrest was unfounded, leading to dismissal of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 7TH DECEMBER 2006 / 16TH AGRAHAYANA 1928
Bail Appl..No. 7090 of 2006() ----------------------------(CRIME NOT REGISTERED)
PETITIONER
PRASAD V., S/O.VASUDEVAN, AGED 35 YEARS, PLAVILAYIL HOUSE, K.S.PURAM P.O., KADATHOOR, KOLLAM.
BY ADV. SRI.BRIJESH MOHAN
RESPONDENTS:
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SHRI P.N.SUKUMARAN
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
V.RAMKUMAR, J.
B.A.No. 7090 OF 2006
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2006
O R D E R
Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail on the allegation that the Nedumangad Police are after him at the instance of one Jalaludeen.
Recording the submission made by the learned Public Prosecutor, this petition is dismissed.
V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE
dsn
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted when no crime is registered against the petitioner.
PRASAD V., S/O.VASUDEVAN
STATE OF KERALA
THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NEDUMANGAD POLICE STATION
V. RAMKUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
