Allowed

Vijayakumar v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC4 Dec 2006Bail Appl./6734/2006

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala, through Shri Justice V. Ramkumar, disposed of Bail Application No. 6734 of 2006 filed by Vijayakumar, an accused in an offence under Sections 8(1) and 8(2) of the Abkari Act. The court granted bail with a bond of Rs. 20,000 and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on executing a bond of Rs. 20,000 with two solvent sureties each for Rs. 20,000.

Vijayakumar Vs State of Kerala — Narcotics (NDPS) | Kerala HC (2006)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR MONDAY, THE 4TH DECEMBER 2006 / 13TH AGRAHAYANA 1928 Bail Appl..No. 6734 of 2006() ----------------------------CMP.6030/2006 of J.M.F.C.-II,PATHANAMTHITTA OR.NO.42/06 OF KONNY EXCISE RANGE. .................... PETITIONER/ACCUSED --------------------------VIJAYAKUMAR, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O.MADHAVAN NAIR, KALEECKAL MELETHIL, KOCHALUMMOODU, NJAKKUNILAM (PO), VALLICODE VILLAGE.

¶4

BY ADV. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN

¶5

RESPONDENTS: STATE -------------------------STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶6

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SHRI P.N.SUKUMARAN

¶7

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶8

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶9

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

¶10

BAIL APPLICATION NO. 6734 OF 2006

¶11

- - - - - - - - - ----------------------- - - - - - -

¶12

DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2006

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

In this Petition filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is the accused inO.R.No.42/06 of Konny Excise Range for offences punishable under Sections 8(1) and 8(2) of the Abkari Act for having been found in possession of 5 liters of arrack on 3.11.2006, seeks his enlargement on bail. The petitioner was arrested on the same day.

¶15

I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶16

Having regard to the nature of the offences, the duration of judicial custody of the petitioner and the other circumstances of the case etc., I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his executing a bond for Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the J.F.C.M.-II, Pathanamthitta and subject to the following conditions:

¶17

Petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

¶18

B.A.NO.6734/06

¶19

Page numbers

¶20

The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

¶21

The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

¶22

If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶23

This application is allowed as above.

¶24

dsn

¶25

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.

Vijayakumar v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijayakumar v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.P.Pravin Vs State of Kerala

Sathesan and Others Vs State of Kerala and Another

Suresh Kumar Vs State of Kerala

Raju Vs State of Kerala & Another

Muhammed Shafeek Rahman @ Shafeek Vs Intelligence Officer

Mohammed Sameer Vs Dy.Director,Directorate of Revenue Intel