Allowed

Suresh Kumar v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC1 Dec 2006Bail Appl./6920/2006

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Kerala High Court granted bail to the third accused facing charges of culpable homicide not amounting to murder and furnishing false information. The order prescribed conditions including weekly reporting and non-interference with witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties each for Rs. 10,000, conditioned to report to the IO and not tamper with witnesses.

Suresh Kumar Vs State of Kerala — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Kerala HC (2006)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 1ST DECEMBER 2006 / 10TH AGRAHAYANA 1928

¶4

Bail Appl..No. 6920 of 2006()

¶5

----------------------------CMP.1562/2006 of J.M.F.C.,KARUNAGAPPALLY CRIME NO.1214/06 OF KARUNAGAPPALLY POLICE STATION

¶6

PETITIONER/3RD ACCUSED

¶7

¶8

SURESHKUMAR, S/O.THANKAPPAN PILLAI, VILAYIL VEETTIL, VENGARA MURI, KALLELIBHAGAM VILLAGE, (FROM PUTHEN VEETTIL, THAZHUTHALA VILLAGE), KOLLAM DISTRICT.

¶9

BY ADV. SRI.SIJU KAMALASANAN SRI.S.SUDHEESHKAR

¶10

RESPONDENTS: STATE

¶11

¶12

STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KARUNAGAPPALLY, THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶13

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SHRI P.N.SUKUMARAN

¶14

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶15

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶16

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

¶17

BAIL APPLICATION NO. 6920 OF 2006

¶18

- - - - - - - - - ----------------------- - - - - - - DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2006

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

In this Petition filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is the 3^rd accused in Crime No.1214/06 of Karunagappally Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 304 and 201 I.P.C., seeks his enlargement on bail.

¶21

I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶22

Having regard to the nature of the offences, the duration of judicial custody of the petitioner and the other circumstances of the case etc., I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the J.F.C.M., Karunagappally and subject to the following conditions:

¶23

The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

¶24

The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

¶25

B.A.NO.6920/06

¶26

Page numbers

¶27

The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

¶28

If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶29

This application is allowed as above.

¶30

dsn

¶31

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.

Suresh Kumar v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh Kumar v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manoj Mathew Vs State of Kerala and Another

Basheer Vs S.I.of Police, Atholi & Another

Saraswathy Amma Vs State of Kerala

G.P.Pravin Vs State of Kerala

Sathesan and Others Vs State of Kerala and Another

Thamarakshan Vs State of Kerala