Writ petition seeking correction of mutation and RTC entries based on a compromise statement was withdrawn by the petitioner; withdrawal permitted subject to payment of court fee, with liberty to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2026:KHC:3316 WP No. 36902 of 2025
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
WRIT PETITION NO. 36902 OF 2025 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. GIRIYAPPA S/O LATE CHIKKARANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS, R/AT MACHALADORE VILLAGE, HAGALAWADI HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572 216.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SANDESHA A S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by KRISHNAPPA LAXMI YASHODA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.SHAMANTH NAIK., HCGP)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING TO 3RD
NC: 2026:KHC:3316 WP No. 36902 of 2025
HC-KAR
RESPONDENT TO MAKE CORRECTION IN MUTATION AND RTC ENTRIES BY CONSIDERING THE COMPROMISE STATEMENT MARKED AS ANNEXURE - E DTD 31-07-2023.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for petitioner has filed a memo dated 19.01.2026 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition on the ground that several office objections have been raised and for compliance of the same several other documents are required.
Sd/(R DEVDAS) JUDGE
KLY : CT: JL
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri. Giriyappa s/o Late Chikkarangappa
The State of Karnataka rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department
The Assistant Commissioner, Tumakuru Sub Division
The Thasildar, Taluk Office Gubbi
R Devdas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
