Disposed¶34

Agni Aero Sports Adventure Academy Pvt. Ltd. v. the National Highways Authority of India

Karnataka HC9 Jun 2026WP/21320/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC, decided 09-06-2026, Suraj Govindaraj J; WP No. 21320 of 2025 (GM-RES); Agni Aero Sports Adventure Academy Pvt Ltd v National Highways Authority of India and Government Flying Training School; Article 226 Constitution of India; mandamus; hangar and structures at Jakkur Aerodrome; demolition/damage to property; damages claim is mixed question of fact and law requiring evidence; liberty reserved to file damages proceedings; writ petition disposed; relates to order dated 5.10.2021 in WP 6958/2020.

What did the court decide?

No mandamus granted; liberty reserved to the petitioner to file such proceedings as may be advised agitating the claim for damages. ¶34

Agni Aero Sports Adventure Academy Pvt. Ltd. Vs the… — Company and Corporate | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:27730 WP No. 21320 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 9^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 21320 OF 2025 (GM-RES)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

AGNI AERO SPORTS ADVENTURE ACADEMY PVT LTD JAKKUR AERODOME, BANGALORE - 64 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, MK SRIRAM A COMPANY INCORORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. ARNAV A BAGALWADI., ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA BANGALORE - TUMKUR ROAD BESIDE NAGASANDRA METRO STATION, BANGALORE 560 073 REPRESENTED BY PROJECT DIRECTOR NHAI, PIU BANGALORE.

¶15

GOVERNMENT FLYING TRAINING SCHOOL JAKKUR AERODROME, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

¶16

…RESPONDENTS

¶17

(BY SRI. SHILPA SHAH., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK., HCGP FOR R2)

¶18

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OR ANY OTHER WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS RESTRAINING THE 1ST RESPONDENT FROM INTERFERING BY

¶19

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:27730 WP No. 21320 of 2025

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

DEMOLISHING, DIGGING, TRESPASSING, DAMAGING THE HANGAR AND STRUCTURES ADJOINING TO THE HANGAR BELONGING TO THE PETITIONER AND ETC.

¶22

THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISS FOR NONPROSECUTION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶23

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

¶24

ORAL ORDER

¶25

The Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:

¶26

i) Issue a writ or any other writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus restraining the 1st respondent from interfering by demolishing, digging, trespassing, damaging the hangar and structures adjoining to the hangar belonging to the petitioner.

¶27

ii) Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus Directing the respondent No.1 and 2, to adhere to the order passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP 6958/2020 dated 5.10.2021 (Annexure-A)

¶28

iii) Any such order, directions as may deem fit in the interest of justice and equity.

¶29

Essentially what the petitioner had sought for was for an order restraining the demolition, digging, trespassing or damaging the hangar and structures. This Court had permitted Respondent No.1 to carry out the works on the acquired land.

¶30

The submission today made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner is that there is damage which has been caused to the property of the Petitioner which needs to be restituted.

¶31

¶32

NC: 2026:KHC:27730 WP No. 21320 of 2025

¶33

HC-KAR

¶34

If that be so, any assessment of damage would require evidence to be led since it is a mixed question of fact and law. Reserving liberty to the Petitioner to file such proceedings as may be advised, agitating the claim for damages, the Writ Petition stands disposed .

¶35

SD/(SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE

¶36

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39

¶37

PRS

Agni Aero Sports Adventure Academy Pvt. Ltd. v. the National Highways Authority of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Agni Aero Sports Adventure Academy Pvt. Ltd. v. the National Highways Authority of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri. T.S. Thirumala Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt G Chandrakala Vs the State of Karnataka

M/S Nandi Hospitality Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri. L. Venkata Rama Reddy Vs the Chairman

Mr Anirudh Vs F- Grade Global Services Pvt. Ltd.

Sri Swamy H D Vs the State of Karnataka