Disposed¶24
Naseem Unnisa v. State of Karnataka
Karnataka HCWP/20300/2026
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
General parole of convict prisoners; writ petition under Articles 226 and 227, Constitution of India; Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; single petition covering two detainees (Abdul Samad @ Samad CTP-3387 and Abdul Wahid CTP-3391, Central Prison Belagavi) disposed of with liberty to file separate petitions; petitioner is the mother of the convicts; parole request not adjudicated on merits; no impugned order, no cited precedents, no monetary relief.
What did the court decide?
Liberty reserved to the petitioner to file two separate petitions in respect of each detainee; no direction for release on general parole was granted. ¶24