Sri Sucheth v. Sri Sukesh Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
Certiorari writ petition dismissed as infructuous; challenge to rejection of Order VI Rule 17 CPC amendment application (I.A. Nos. 8 and 9) in MVC No. 1179/2019 before the Senior Civil Judge and Addl. MACT, Kundapura, on the ground of support by memorandum of facts instead of affidavit; fresh amendment application with affidavit subsequently allowed by the claims tribunal during pendency; Karnataka High Court, Suraj Govindaraj J., 13-07-2026; respondent includes Reliance General Insurance Co., Ltd.
What did the court decide?
The Court accepted the memo and submission of counsel for the petitioner that during the pendency of the writ petition the petitioner filed a fresh application along with an affidavit under Order VI Rule 17 and the same was allowed by the claims tribunal ¶2