Sri Nagaraj v. Smt Rangamma
Case brief
What is this about?
No substantive judgment was delivered as the appellant's counsel did not appear, and the appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution after multiple listings.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel.
What the court decided
NC: 2025:KHC:51232 RSA No. 563 of 2024
- 1 -
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.563 OF 2024 (PAR/POS)
BETWEEN:
- SRI. NAGARAJ SON OF LATE KAMBALAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS RESIDING AT GANGANALA VILLAGE KORA HOBLI TUMAKURU TALUK AND DISTRICT PIN CODE – 572 128.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SIDDAMALLAPPA P.M., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
Parties & counsel
- appellant
SRI. NAGARAJ SON OF LATE KAMBALAIAH
- respondent
SMT. RANGAMMA WIFE OF LATE KAMBALAIAH
- respondent
SMT. JAYAMMA DAUGHTER OF LATE KAMBALAIAH
- respondent
SMT. SIDDAGANGAMMA
- respondent
SRI. GANGADHARAIAH K.R.
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/563/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court